What legal arguments could be raised by Sudson in support of the enforcement of the automatic renewal clause against Letisha? Explain.

Be careful what you sign

There are several legal arguments that Sudson could raise in order to enforce the automatic renewal clause against Letisha. Firstly, it is important to note whether or not the contract was legally binding; if so then this would strengthen their case as it would show that both parties agreed and understood the terms of the agreement. Furthermore, they could argue that since Letisha failed to cancel her subscription before the expiration date according to the contract’s clause then she is liable for any additional fees incurred by automatically renewing her membership.

Additionally, they may also bring up other clauses within this document such as a “non-negotiable term” which states that certain aspects cannot be changed or amended even after signing. This provides further support for Sudson’s argument regarding enforcement of this particular clause. Finally, they could also refer to any applicable laws or regulations which protect businesses from financial losses due to customers failing to adhere to their contractual agreements thus providing them with an additional layer of protection when dealing with cases like these.