What are some issues you can think of with using this type of diagnosis?

One potential issue that arises with the use of a deontological approach to ethical decision making is that it can be abused by those in positions of power. By relying on absolute rules and predetermined moral codes, individuals may be able to manipulate the system for their own benefit without consequence. For example, someone in a managerial position may be able to justify unethical behavior as “the right thing” if it aligns with their particular moral code. Additionally, this type of diagnosis fails to take into account human emotions or feelings when evaluating an action, which could lead to unfair decisions being made. Furthermore, by only focusing on adhering strictly to established principles and disregarding outcomes or consequences, this approach could also result in inefficient solutions as pragmatic considerations are often overlooked.

Finally, due to its black-and-white nature and refusal to consider context or amendability depending on the situation at hand, a deontological approach can sometimes lead people astray from what really matters – achieving justice and fairness for all parties involved. This means that individuals who adhere strictly to established principles may miss out on opportunities for learning and growth through experience due to their rigid adherence towards morality over practicality.