Would Ford’s  decision to forego repairing the defective design comply with   these ethical  guidelines? If so, why? If not, then what actions should Ford   have taken to  satisfy them?

Ford’s decision to forego repairing the defective design does not comply with ethical guidelines as it fails to take responsibility for its own mistakes. Ethically, companies should be held accountable for their actions and strive to make changes that benefit those affected by their decisions—in this case ensuring the safety of their customers by providing them with a reliable product.

To satisfy these standards Ford should have taken immediate action such as recalling all cars containing faulty parts in order to minimize potential harm caused due to any accidents that may occur while also working on solutions repair issue quickly and efficiently. Had they done so, customers would feel more secure knowing that company behind product was taking necessary precautions protect them from any danger associated with using said item.

In conclusion then it is important remember companies bear moral obligations towards stakeholders—particularly when comes issues involving public health/safety which must upheld regardless cost attached . By following ethical practices can demonstrate commitment customer satisfaction resulting greater trust long term success organization moving forward.