List three factors that managers use in deciding whether or not to investigate a variance and give an example of each.

1. Magnitude: Managers may decide to investigate a variance if it is considered “significant” (e.g. – 10% or more) as compared to historical performance/budgeted amounts.
2. Frequency: If the same variance appears multiple times in similar circumstances, managers may opt to conduct an investigation in order determine root cause of issue and take corrective action accordingly.
3. Impact: If the variances have potential repercussions such as increased costs or decreased sales, then managers might choose investigate further in order identify possible solutions & prevent future occurrences from occurring. For example – a retailer may decide look into why their stock levels are running low after noticing several discrepancies over past few months which could indicate demand has been higher than expected/anticipated!

The developers of this technology are trying to sell it to the general public by emphasizing its potential benefits and focusing on how it can help improve quality of life and overall wellbeing. They also emphasize that integrative health provides greater autonomy as individuals can decide what works best for them based upon their own circumstances. Additionally, they highlight that the model could result in lower costs since many treatments can be done at home without need for expensive medications/equipment. The developers are likely appealing to emotions such as hope, security, empowerment, and peace of mind in order to convince people to use this technology. Finally – they may also consider ways in which humans change due to the usage of this technology including improved physical and mental health; decreased stress levels; better sleep quality; increased energy levels; enhanced cognitive functioning; and more overall emotional balance.