Evaluate the  systematic review or practice guideline relies primarily on studies conducted in the last five years.

A systematic review or practice guideline that relies primarily on studies conducted in the last five years can be a useful tool for staying up-to-date on best practices and current trends. This type of review allows professionals to identify any potential changes that have occurred over time which may affect their decision making or approach to providing care. Additionally, focusing only on recent research also helps reduce the chance of outdated information being used which could lead to inaccurate conclusions.

However, relying solely on studies conducted within a five year timeframe could potentially limit access to important data that may be relevant but was published outside this window. Furthermore, not all topics will have enough available literature from the past five years so it is important for practitioners to be aware of these limitations when utilizing systematic reviews or practice guidelines as part of their decision making process. Ultimately, combining both recent and older research with other sources such as feedback from patients/colleagues can help ensure more comprehensive assessments are being made when determining approaches for patient care.