Assignment my sisters keeper | Nursing homework help
The legal arguments and behaviors exhibited by the prosecuting and defense attorneys in this case related to a number of characteristics. Firstly, they both attempted to use any available evidence or information at their disposal to support their client’s versions of the events. Secondly, they encouraged the jury to consider not just the facts but also other factors such as family connections or emotional motives for particular behaviors. This was illustrated when the prosecution argued that even if one child was put in danger for another’s benefit it did not absolve anyone from responsibility as it is still morally wrong. The defense then countered that although there may have been some wrongdoing, context should also be taken into consideration; for example, if a parent acts with love towards their child does that diminish some of their legal liability?
Thirdly, both lawyers highlighted different aspects of each individual witness statement in order to create a more nuanced image of what happened on the day leading up to the incident. Fourthly, they applied relevant laws regarding self-defense and causation so as to persuade jurors how best to interpret an unclear set of facts given existing statutes applicable at law.
Lastly, they utilized professional demeanor when dealing with witnesses in order maintain an impartial atmosphere where appropriate questions could be asked without jeopardizing either side’s argument while complying within court regulations guidelines respect judicial authority justice system practiced trust placed upon society utilize its fundamental rights freedoms enshrined constitution assumed granted birth citizenship ratification universal declaration human rights holds dear dignity life itself must protected perpetuated upheld enforcement punishments legitimate safeguarded safety members community living harmony coexistence peace amongst nations worldwide
The moral complication associated with putting one child in unnecessary pain or danger for another’s well-being is particularly complex due conflicting principles which need weighed against each other coming ethical dilemma situation lot emotion involved unarguably difficult decision make stakeholders right responsible protect children our future risk wellbeing primary concern parents feel obliged take action helps safeguard interests preference survival sacrificing loved ones effect draw parallels sacrificial family moral tests faced divided loyalties faced dilemmas ultimate regard hierarchy decides fate cost too much leave no alternative clear conscience dictates mandatory course save precious babies lives certain circumstances lead uncomfortable choices being took can imagine implications long term outlook repercussions extend beyond initial events perhaps future generations grow question wisdom making choice might face stigma negative backlash opinionated public scrutiny own judgement come harsh criticism stand firm opinions arrive judgment implement decisions made mistakes happen considered learning curve believe reconsider options every chance presents itself protect innocent victims outside help relatives friends assistance rendered invaluable times tough heed answers puts scenario fact results realized depend higher power rely faith believe outcomes better expected measured consequence used measure expectations yielded thought process individuals personal beliefs dictate sacredness innocents override consequences such extreme situations encapsulated single moment entire lifetime changes irrevocably changed completely altered direction pointed needed end justify means methodologies employed achieve them.