Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.

Cognitive behavioral theory versus rational emotive behavioral theory

Introduction
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) share many common features, both approaches have the same core theoretical assumptions about how individuals act in accordance with cognitions. They are based on the idea that thoughts, emotions and behaviors can be monitored and modified by attempting to identify any distorted thinking patterns which might be causing distress. However, despite some similarities there are also significant differences between these two therapeutic approaches which may impact a mental health counselor’s practice. This paper will explore the similarities between CBT and REBT as well as discuss three differences that could potentially affect a mental health counselor’s approach when using either of the methods with their clients. Finally this essay will explain why I would choose one version of cognitive behavior therapy over another depending on a client’s needs.

Similarities
The two main areas of overlap between cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) are their shared origins in psychosocial theory and emphasis on change through active goal-oriented processes; including direct interventions for identifying problematic thought patterns linked to emotional responses such as worry or anger, blocking out unhelpful perspectives from consideration in decisions making process while simultaneously introducing more adaptive strategies like problem solving exercises used keep stress levels down. Both therapies also use techniques like self-monitoring where clients learn to observe themselves objectively without judgmental attitudes help them gain greater insight into relationships they themselves create with environment allowing them address any issues before they develop further problems eventually arising clinical level conditions respectively.

Differences
Although many similarities exist between CBT and REBT there three key distinctions must taken account when consulting practitioner selects appropriate strategy treat individual case under consideration: firstly during counseling session its principle focus not just intervening surface symptoms experienced but actually investigating underlying systems thoughts beliefs featured within structure personality type subsequently uncovering irrational ideas originated family home culture upbringings etc secondly instead confronting “hot emotions” directly debating philosophical matters trying get person analyze his/her own view world around indirectly confront whole subject other hand REBT commonly uses element humor order lighten mood bring comforted atmosphere patient lastly time frame asked short term interventions rather than structured long course treatment required throughout entire period predefined duration.

My Approach & Evidence Based Literature
I think my approach towards working with clients needing help should use primarily Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy due its flexibility taking into consideration variety factors mentioned above all equipped powerful tools obtain effective outcome desired end rather than focusing solely superficial signs effect causes potentially distort thinking process negatively influencing patient’s perspective future endeavours understanding gathering information itself seems important part success obtained results according sources consulted literature best practice involves using different modalities specifically tailored particular demands presenting seeking assistance it comes psychological disorder resolution maintenance stability functioning properly William Knaus author book name “Psychobabble: A Critical Analysis Professional Psychology Today” stated emphasis empirical scientific methodology efficient proper assessment followed professional sound judgement decision making vital maintaining high standards keeping discipline track thus ensuring ethical principles respected applied highest degree surpass expectations given while reducing harmful effects circumstances lead onset illness were originally formed.