For arguments to have an effect on multiple spheres of society, research is vital. Many studies achieve their goals when they use the right approaches. However, each approach and outcome has its strengths and weaknesses depending on which method is used. This study aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each technique as well as the results of the sections that are being evaluated.
Dance of Pairs During Deployment
Based on their research, the writers used questionnaires to collect data. According to Ponder & Carbajal (2020), the strategy was effective in acquiring information on the service member and their spouse, including their ethnicity, length of relationship, deployment location, branch, communication channel, and number of deployments. These vital details may not be available to people unless they are asked specific questions about their responsibilities. The procedure section, however, is lacking because it does not recognize the fact that confidential information can’t be published in public accessible publications. Based on ratings ranging from 1 to 6.33, the findings show that anxiety and avoidance levels are connected with combat techniques among veterans (Ponder & Carbajal, 2020). This suggests that different warfare methods have different effects on veterans depending upon their anxiety levels and other factors. The findings section does not provide an explanation for the results, including the Cronbach alpha of 97. Because they ensure participants are honest about what is expected, I prefer focus group talks to write this paper. Protecting veterans’ privacy is what I believe would be my top priority.
Ascending women to leadership positions
Researchers used interviews as part of a phenomenological approach to research. Carbajal et al. (1999) conducted qualitative research using interviews. The study examined the experiences and perspectives of women working in rural non-profits as they move up to leadership roles. It is a great way to get firsthand knowledge directly from those in high positions. Researchers were given the opportunity to see the work place by arranging meetings with influential women. However, this approach has the disadvantage that it reduces diversity, because this article is focused on women who are in managerial positions.