Scott McLean has written a comprehensive and insightful essay on the United States’ healthcare system, Universal Health Care Coverage (UHC). This article claims that healthcare costs in America are too high for lower- and middle class Americans. The article also states that while some people have health insurance coverage, it is expensive and they may not be covered in certain cases, like cancer. McLean, n.d., states in his first paragraph that insurance companies put profits before clients’ needs. It is grounded on a compelling argument which should serve as an alarm to the authorities in the United States and all residents to call for healthcare reform.
Mclean claims that Universal Health Care should be offered in America so all Americans, no matter what their income, can have healthcare. McLean believes that healthcare must be treated in the same way as public education to ensure moral principles regarding healthcare delivery. UHC also has great potential because it adheres principal ideals that hinder corrupt systems, leading to improved health access, and better outcomes.
Counterarguments
Although the author is pro-Universal Health Care, or UHC, arguments, including the cost and high quality of the healthcare system, are presented by him, as well as counterarguments. UHC will be costly because it increases taxes and costs of living. This would cost the American people. UHC’s implementation would be criticized for creating long wait lists and increasing debt (McLean, 1999). Opponents have suggested that UHC would not be implemented in the United States if they have already tried similar systems, like France and Canada.
Essay’s Opinions and Facts
This report, which does not focus on the author’s position but presents other points of view to it, is comprehensive and balanced. The reader can understand the subject and be able to make informed decisions about UHC adoption to improve health outcomes for everyone. But the story doesn’t tell the whole truth. It does not address the opposition to UHC, nor does it include the perspectives of program administrators. The essay is based mainly on general facts and assumptions. McLean, n.d., adds that UHC critics claim that sick patients from these nations are often stuck in lengthy lines and on long waiting lists to get essential medical care. He does not name any single UHC opponent or provide citations for empirical data.