In the book, William Apess shows how environment can affect an individual’s sense of identity. He is likely to have learned from his mixed-race parents how important it is to embrace diversity and accept all races. He gained a fresh perspective when he met his grandparents. Apess, like other mixed-racial members, doesn’t have an identifiable race within American culture. These groups were historically used to bridge diverse racial communities in America. His perspective was broadened by growing up with both a Pequot grandpa, and an equally white grandmother. However, the most important event was when Apess was made a slave, and allowed to go to school by his owner. Apess realized that Native Americans were not able to become Christians and he decided to go to war for them. Americans of European descent tried to eradicate the Indians and American history. Apess highlights this issue in her essay. The narrative states that evictions kept the Indians (such as the Pequot) from leaving an imprint on American history. Apess knew that Indian Removal Act actions would result in the Indians losing their connection to America. In order to make someone’s identity less secure, it is necessary that one proves their ancestors didn’t own any property. In order to protect their nationality, the white American Indians wanted to take Indians from their territories. Native Americans were first introduced to planting cultivation in New England during the 19th century. Apess describes how Native White Americans plotted against Indian Natives in an essay about their efforts to eradicate them from land where they could grow crops. Religion was an awakening moment that strengthened Apess’ perspective of the separation that exists in American culture. Methodism’s faith in justice and equity are the major causes (Apess 1829). Because of this, the platform did not set racial boundaries. Apess was taught by this platform that Americans were equal in their rights to access property and identity. It is concerning that the Indians weren’t mainly Methodist. This was however not intentional. According to the book, the Native Americans in New England were against the inclusion of Indians into Methodism due to their disparities. Methodism’s doctrines were based on equality, it was thought. This would have led to a divergence from the actual inclinations that the Europeans had, which, among others, included the treatment of Indians with regard to property access and other matters.