An efficient approach to program evaluation improves the effectiveness of implementation and allows for objective control. The four criteria for program assessment are combined to determine program effectiveness, objectivity and efficiency before it is executed. Prior to program implementation, the needs assessment is performed. Prior to program implementation, needs assessment ensures that the program is viable, suitable, and acceptable (Grinnell, Gabor & Unrau, 2019). A needs assessment is necessary when updating or creating a program. The assessment of the needs helps to determine SMART targets which should be met during implementation. The process evaluation helps stakeholder to assess optimal resource use, achieve pre-determined goals, and resolve any obstacles. In order to assess the ability of an institution to deliver the desired outputs, it examines many elements such as its management, infrastructure and programs. The process analysis allows for a detailed examination of all interventions that were used to solve the problems of a program. Institutions and other stakeholders can evaluate program execution through the evaluation of its results (Posavac (2015)). An evaluation of the results shows whether or not the main goal has been achieved. Examining the effectiveness of a method is what determines whether it produced an ideal result. This assessment is primarily about comparing program outputs with inputs, and finding ways to maximize output using available resources. To evaluate program execution’s cost effectiveness, you can use instruments like the Cost performance Index.
The inability to obtain information using any one of four methods of assessment limits program effectiveness, program efficiency, and program resource utilization. Policymakers as well the public should be concerned about the need assessment process. It considers future and current trends, resources availability, social vulnerability, opportunities, and how best to manage external pressure. (Grinnell, et al. 2019, 2019). These are critical elements when designing SMART program goals. Because they are not aware of all the environmental complexity and uncertainties, policymakers will be unable to create comprehensive policies when there is no information regarding needs assessments. It will also be hard for stakeholders to come together on common concerns. Without data on needs assessments, stakeholders will construct programs based more on subjective than objective considerations.
Without process assessment data, it is difficult to examine the relationship between service provided and output. Officials will have to identify and correct any deviations in implementation before the program’s effectiveness is affected. It is difficult to spot defects or deviations in product execution and this can further undermine program goals. An evaluation of the process helps determine the accessibility and acceptance of the program among target audiences. It is more challenging to adapt programs to the needs of target audiences if you don’t have process assessment data.