The Land of Open Graves is a guide that contextualizes the results and repercussions of the Prevention By way of Deterrence Coverage. This guide by anthropologist Jason De Leon exposes the harm brought on by this coverage on migrants and their households through using each archeological and anthropological analysis methodologies. De Leon sheds gentle on the deaths of a number of migrants who had crossed the U.S. border and relates their tales of ache and hardship. These migrants immigrated to the US looking for a greater life, solely to endure bodily and psychological obstacles of their pursuit of their aspirations. The guide is structured into three main sections, the primary of which focuses on the border management ways that had been carried out to make it very dangerous for migrants to enter the US (Nevins 101). The second part focuses on the person experiences, adventures, and repercussions of people who efficiently crossed the border. The conclusion of the narrative concentrates on the implications for many who efficiently crossed the border and people who didn’t. The Land of Open Graves is a guide that provides main archeological knowledge that tries to make the most of the experiences of migrants to the US by providing necessary data based mostly on archeology and ethnological examine.
The US Customs and Border Safety Company has carried out a coverage of prevention through deterrence to discourage the admission of unauthorized migrants into the US. Whereas the prevention by deterrence approach has been utilized to severely impression the lives of migrants by torturing them and inflicting bodily and psychological ache, documentation and humanitarianism have been introduced as an ethical justification for the technique (Nevins 111). The customs and border patrol agent has maintained for a very long time that the processes and strategies employed at worldwide crossings take humanitarian necessities and human life into consideration. The technique breaches human rights in actuality.
De Leon employs each archeological and anthropological methods of investigation to completely refute this ethical excuse. First, the society is examined from an anthropological standpoint. This examine approach enabled him to grasp the ambiance, actions, and surrounds of the migrants of their current circumstances, so getting perception into their ache and hardships (Ploder and Hamann 7). De Leon displays the appliance of prevention by deterrence methods alongside the Mexican border city of Nogales and the circumstances of deportees contained in the city, and this technique is evident. However, the US-Mexico border gave an archeological channel for De Leon to uncover different human rights violations dedicated by the technique (Vogt 384).