In the last two decades, it has been questioned how important the Electoral College (EC), voting mechanism was. Two out of four of the most successful presidents have been elected with less than 50% of the popular vote. This has led some political opponents to assert that the constant use of electronic voting is the biggest danger to democracy in the United States (Greenberg & Page, 2018). The United States should retain the EC system because of its long period of cohesion, improved position of minority interest, continued federal system of governance, enhanced presentation, and the longer period of stability.
The United States is a multi-cultural country and the government must preserve the EC system to foster unity and equality. The EC system allowed the states to have the first vote in determining the President. It promotes equal population distribution in the presidential election (Bugh 2016). This encourages all candidates for the highest office in the country to run across every state regardless of their population density. The selection of voters is also affected by public connections to major political parties.
The voting system also prevents majority rule by distributing equality. The EC system was designed to balance the competing interests of major and small nations. A voting system based on popularity can lead to bigger states dominating smaller ones’ will (Edwards III 2019, 2019). This will lead to greater state-to-state inequalities. Because of the crowded electoral process, a candidate for president will tend to overlook smaller states or favor big cities.
EC is also a way to enhance federalism, allowing each state the opportunity to voice its concern or ideals as a unit of the federation. EC forms the foundation for the United States’ federal government structure. Abolishing the system in favor of public election would diminish the states’ control and power (Greenberg & Page, 2018). The distinction between state and federal governments will be diminished.