There are many interests in the project team regarding the opening of an Indian branch and the instability that could result from the closing of one site. A single goal should be the focus of all members to reduce division. Interpersonal conflict between team members can be caused by their different interests and desire to protect their jobs. For site closure decisions to be made, the team leader must work with site managers and collaborate with them.
Different case-specific needs, goals, and roles.
For each site’s viability and long-term sustainability, the team considers its brand equity, market share, turnover, income generation and other data such as operating expenses.
Possibility solution: Use objective criteria to assess quantitative data.
Site administrators might withhold important information to undermine the review, including income statistics, operating expenses and retention statistics.
For an impartial assessment of each location, the team would review margins and turnover rate as well as sales and brand equity. Overhead expenses are also considered to be considered.
Threaten site administrators to provide correct statistics.
Management that is not cooperative with the locations doing badly.
The team must offer job stability and/or a transfer to encourage the access of crucial information.
It is necessary for the project team to have sufficient evidence of reliability and validity in order to assess the performances at the sites.
This team reviews the available data and interviews underperforming managers to determine if they are eligible for closure.
You must ensure objective analysis of your sales volume, profit margin, operational costs, and brand equity rates.
Insufficient organization or assessment of existing criteria.
Each site manager performs similar SWOT and cost benefit analyses.
Site administrators may have trouble providing accurate information due to the belief that they are unfairly targeted.
Be prepared for any possible opposition. Take proactive and peaceful steps to gain the information that you require to arrive at an impartial conclusion.
Counteraccusations can be caused by ineffective team coordination.
Solution: You can complete the investigation in six months.
When the set time limit is exceeded, the team has to pay significant expenses for monitoring and payment.
This team spent three months reviewing available data in order to find unsustainable and non-performing institutions that need to be shut down.
Using ambiguous phrases like soon.
Failure to reach an agreement could result in a delay.
Assure that everyone adheres to project timelines.