Peter Richards is a college professor who explained the reasons why tuition for college should not be charged. Peter suggested that government investment in higher education could provide substantial returns. Peter asserted that the benefits of higher education and the associated earnings are worth at least twice what they cost.
1B. 1.B. Give a persuasive quote from the respondent explaining why they choose that side. Enter your source, and then enter the quotation.
Free college tuition has been proven to increase college students’ chances of graduation. Richards claims that there’s a direct correlation between higher graduation rates and programs offering free education. All Americans can enjoy comfort and success because there are no tuition fees (Murphy 9). Richards felt that a bachelor’s is a requirement for economic success.
2A. Talk about another reason that they chose this side. Richards noted that students also like having free communication on campus. Students don’t want to worry about not being able to afford tuition next year. Their financial status is unknown, especially next year. Obtaining a degree requires time.
2B. 2.B. Enter your source, and then enter the quotation.
Richards suggests that Richards may have a critical role to play in making it clear that students from economically disadvantaged areas can still afford college. Richards is emphasizing the importance of this communication for students from low-income families. Richards claims that it can be hard to get children out of poverty to enroll in college. This is especially true if the school’s high cost makes them anxious. The free college program, however, is more successful in recruiting students as it addresses the needs of children who can’t afford high school tuition.