According to the Greater Fool Theory (Bennett 2003), there will always be buyers willing to pay more for assets than they are worth. The hypothesis is a popular idea among investors. It states that an entrepreneur that subscribes to this theory would rather buy assets that are too expensive than those that are cheap. This idea is related to quality and price, where a higher price indicates a larger market for the product (Oberholzer 2010). Investors will buy overpriced assets, regardless of how much they are worth in the end. They will often think that they are foolish to buy this stuff for such a high price. However, I know of a bigger fool who would be willing to pay more and generate a profit. The fundamental price of any commodity depends on market factors such as supply and demand, profitability or profits of parent firms, and outlook for stocks. However, in some cases, the value of an organization, as expressed in its stock prices, can become too attractive. This is because stocks and portfolios are not governed by market forces, but by expectations that the demand for the commodity will rise in the future and investors will be in a position to profit from it. This model subscribers don’t know what the actual market price, cash flow of parent firms, or profitability should be. Instead, subscribers are curious about the possibility that stock purchasers might believe the stock’s value is higher than the price they paid. This belief, no matter how absurd, may not be logical. This idea can be approached objectively in many different ways. The first is the idea that an astute investor might find a similarly skilled counterpart who will purchase high-end equities. To meet this requirement, the brand standing of the company must rise or stay steady before resale. Market factors will determine the price of most products. This restricts the range of products that this approach can handle. Similar to crypto equities, such as Bitcoin, this method is also ideal. This idea is based upon the fact that these commodities are heavily influenced by market expectations and not market forces. The crypto sector does not have a government or business setting that governs assets. Nor is the success of its parent company. The clientele depends on media forecasts, demand and other factors that view the sector as still in its infancy. Future expansion of the industry is expected to result in a profit.